The U.S. Supreme Court has reinstated the murder conviction of Pedro Hernandez in the case of Etan Patz, a boy who went missing in New York City in 1979.

Context

The case of Etan Patz has been a significant legal matter since his disappearance, which has remained unresolved for decades.S1S2

Key points

• Pedro Hernandez was convicted in 2017 for the kidnapping and murder of Etan Patz.S2

• An appeals court had previously granted Hernandez a new trial in July.S2

• The Supreme Court's decision reverses the appeals court ruling.S1

• Etan Patz disappeared at the age of six while walking to school in Manhattan.S2

• Hernandez's conviction was based on a confession he made to police.S2

• The case has drawn significant media attention over the years.S1

• The Supreme Court's ruling is seen as a pivotal moment in the long history of the case.S1

• The decision underscores the complexities of legal appeals in murder cases.S2

Why it matters

• The ruling may impact future cases involving confessions and appeals.S2

• It highlights the ongoing challenges in resolving cold cases.S1

What to watch

• Monitor reactions from legal experts regarding the implications of the ruling.S1

• Watch for any further legal maneuvers from Hernandez's defense team.S2